os.TestSeek: use a smaller but still 64-bit seek offset.
Might fix issue 91.
R=r
https://golang.org/cl/152108
diff --git a/src/pkg/os/os_test.go b/src/pkg/os/os_test.go
index 57081af..8c39019 100644
--- a/src/pkg/os/os_test.go
+++ b/src/pkg/os/os_test.go
@@ -541,13 +541,18 @@
test{0, 2, int64(len(data))},
test{0, 0, 0},
test{-1, 2, int64(len(data)) - 1},
- test{1 << 40, 0, 1 << 40},
- test{1 << 40, 2, 1<<40 + int64(len(data))},
+ test{1 << 33, 0, 1 << 33},
+ test{1 << 33, 2, 1<<33 + int64(len(data))},
};
for i, tt := range tests {
off, err := f.Seek(tt.in, tt.whence);
if off != tt.out || err != nil {
- t.Errorf("#%d: Seek(%v, %v) = %v, %v want %v, nil", i, tt.in, tt.whence, off, err, tt.out)
+ if e, ok := err.(*PathError); ok && e.Error == EINVAL && tt.out > 1<<32 {
+ // Reiserfs rejects the big seeks.
+ // http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=91
+ break
+ }
+ t.Errorf("#%d: Seek(%v, %v) = %v, %v want %v, nil", i, tt.in, tt.whence, off, err, tt.out);
}
}
f.Close();