| # Go Modules in 2019 |
| 19 Dec 2018 |
| Tags: tools, versioning |
| Summary: What the Go team is planning for Go modules in 2019. |
| |
| Russ Cox |
| |
| ## What a year! |
| |
| 2018 was a great year for the Go ecosystem, with |
| package management as one of our major focuses. |
| In February, we started a community-wide discussion about how to integrate |
| package management directly into the Go toolchain, |
| and in August we delivered the first rough implementation of that feature, |
| called Go modules, in Go 1.11. |
| The migration to Go modules will be the most far-reaching change |
| for the Go ecosystem since Go 1. |
| Converting the entire ecosystem—code, users, tools, and so on—from |
| GOPATH to modules will require work in many different areas. |
| The module system will in turn help us deliver |
| better authentication and build speeds to the Go ecosystem. |
| |
| This post is a preview of what the Go team is planning |
| relating to modules in 2019. |
| |
| ## Releases |
| |
| Go 1.11, released in August 2018, introduced [preliminary support for modules](https://golang.org/doc/go1.11#modules). |
| For now, module support is maintained alongside the |
| traditional GOPATH-based mechanisms. |
| The `go` command defaults to module mode when run |
| in directory trees outside GOPATH/src and |
| marked by `go.mod` files in their roots. |
| This setting can be overridden by setting the transitional |
| environment variable `$GO111MODULE` to `on` or `off`; |
| the default behavior is `auto` mode. |
| We’ve already seen significant adoption of modules across the Go community, |
| along with many helpful suggestions and bug reports |
| to help us improve modules. |
| |
| Go 1.12, scheduled for February 2019, will refine module support |
| but still leave it in `auto` mode by default. |
| In addition to many bug fixes and other minor improvements, |
| perhaps the most significant change in Go 1.12 |
| is that commands like `go` `run` `x.go` |
| or `go` `get` `rsc.io/2fa@v1.1.0` |
| can now operate in `GO111MODULE=on` mode without an explicit `go.mod` file. |
| |
| Our aim is for Go 1.13, scheduled for August 2019, to enable module mode by |
| default (that is, to change the default from `auto` to `on`) |
| and deprecate GOPATH mode. |
| In order to do that, we’ve been working on better tooling support |
| along with better support for the open-source module ecosystem. |
| |
| ## Tooling & IDE Integration |
| |
| In the eight years that we’ve had GOPATH, |
| an incredible amount of tooling has been created |
| that assumes Go source code is stored in GOPATH. |
| Moving to modules requires updating all code that makes |
| that assumption. |
| We’ve designed a new package, |
| [golang.org/x/tools/go/packages](https://godoc.org/golang.org/x/tools/go/packages), |
| that abstracts the operation of finding and loading information |
| about the Go source code for a given target. |
| This new package adapts automatically to both |
| GOPATH and modules mode and is also extensible |
| to tool-specific code layouts, such as the one |
| used by Bazel. |
| We’ve been working with tool authors throughout the Go community |
| to help them adopt golang.org/x/tools/go/packages in their tools. |
| |
| As part of this effort, we’ve also been working to |
| unify the various source code querying tools |
| like gocode, godef, and go-outline |
| into a single tool that can be used from the |
| command line and also supports |
| the [language server protocol](https://langserver.org/) |
| used by modern IDEs. |
| |
| The transition to modules and the changes in package loading |
| also prompted a significant change to Go program analysis. |
| As part of reworking `go` `vet` to support modules, |
| we introduced a generalized framework for incremental |
| analysis of Go programs, |
| in which an analyzer is invoked for one package at a time. |
| In this framework, the analysis of one package can write out facts |
| made available to analyses of other packages that import the first. |
| For example, `go` `vet`’s analysis of the [log package](https://golang.org/pkg/log/) |
| determines and records the fact that `log.Printf` is a `fmt.Printf` wrapper. |
| Then `go` `vet` can check printf-style format strings in other packages |
| that call `log.Printf`. |
| This framework should enable many new, sophisticated |
| program analysis tools to help developers find bugs earlier |
| and understand code better. |
| |
| ## Module Index |
| |
| One of the most important parts of the original design for `go` `get` |
| was that it was _decentralized_: |
| we believed then—and we still believe today—that |
| anyone should be able to publish their code on any server, |
| in contrast to central registries |
| such as Perl’s CPAN, Java’s Maven, or Node’s NPM. |
| Placing domain names at the start of the `go` `get` import space |
| reused an existing decentralized system |
| and avoided needing to solve anew the problems of |
| deciding who can use which names. |
| It also allowed companies to import code on private servers |
| alongside code from public servers. |
| It is critical to preserve this decentralization as we shift to Go modules. |
| |
| Decentralization of Go’s dependencies has had many benefits, |
| but it also brought a few significant drawbacks. |
| The first is that it’s too hard to find all the publicly-available Go packages. |
| Every site that wants to deliver information about |
| packages has |
| to do its own crawling, or else wait until a user asks |
| about a particular package before fetching it. |
| |
| We are working on a new service, the Go Module Index, |
| that will provide a public log of packages entering the Go ecosystem. |
| Sites like godoc.org and goreportcard.com will be able to watch this log |
| for new entries instead of each independently implementing code |
| to find new packages. |
| We also want the service to allow looking up packages |
| using simple queries, to allow `goimports` to add |
| imports for packages that have not yet been downloaded to the local system. |
| |
| ## Module Authentication |
| |
| Today, `go` `get` relies on connection-level authentication (HTTPS or SSH) |
| to check that it is talking to the right server to download code. |
| There is no additional check of the code itself, |
| leaving open the possibility of man-in-the-middle attacks |
| if the HTTPS or SSH mechanisms are compromised in some way. |
| Decentralization means that the code for a build is fetched |
| from many different servers, which means the build depends on |
| many systems to serve correct code. |
| |
| The Go modules design improves code authentication by storing |
| a `go.sum` file in each module; |
| that file lists the cryptographic hash |
| of the expected file tree for each of the module’s dependencies. |
| When using modules, the `go` command uses `go.sum` to verify |
| that dependencies are bit-for-bit identical to the expected versions |
| before using them in a build. |
| But the `go.sum` file only lists hashes for the specific dependencies |
| used by that module. |
| If you are adding a new dependency |
| or updating dependencies with `go` `get` `-u`, |
| there is no corresponding entry in `go.sum` and therefore |
| no direct authentication of the downloaded bits. |
| |
| For publicly-available modules, we intend to run a service we call a _notary_ |
| that follows the module index log, |
| downloads new modules, |
| and cryptographically signs statements of the form |
| “module M at version V has file tree hash H.” |
| The notary service will publish all these notarized hashes |
| in a queryable, [Certificate Transparency](https://www.certificate-transparency.org/)-style |
| [tamper-proof log](http://static.usenix.org/event/sec09/tech/full_papers/crosby.pdf), |
| so that anyone can verify that the notary is behaving correctly. |
| This log will serve as a public, global `go.sum` file |
| that `go` `get` can use to authenticate modules |
| when adding or updating dependencies. |
| |
| We are aiming to have the `go` command check notarized hashes |
| for publicly-available modules not already in `go.sum` |
| starting in Go 1.13. |
| |
| ## Module Mirrors |
| |
| Because the decentralized `go` `get` fetches code from multiple origin servers, |
| fetching code is only as fast and reliable as the slowest, |
| least reliable server. |
| The only defense available before modules was to vendor |
| dependencies into your own repositories. |
| While vendoring will continue to be supported, |
| we’d prefer a solution that works for all modules—not just the ones you’re already using—and |
| that does not require duplicating a dependency into every |
| repository that uses it. |
| |
| The Go module design introduces the idea of a module proxy, |
| which is a server that the `go` command asks for modules, |
| instead of the origin servers. |
| One important kind of proxy is a _module mirror_, |
| which answers requests for modules by fetching them |
| from origin servers and then caching them for use in |
| future requests. |
| A well-run mirror should be fast and reliable |
| even when some origin servers have gone down. |
| We are planning to launch a mirror service for publicly-available modules in 2019. |
| Other projects, like GoCenter and Athens, are planning mirror services too. |
| (We anticipate that companies will have multiple options for running |
| their own internal mirrors as well, but this post is focusing on public mirrors.) |
| |
| One potential problem with mirrors is that they are |
| precisely man-in-the-middle servers, |
| making them a natural target for attacks. |
| Go developers need some assurance that the mirrors |
| are providing the same bits that the origin servers would. |
| The notary process we described in the previous section |
| addresses exactly this concern, and it |
| will apply to downloads using mirrors |
| as well as downloads using origin servers. |
| The mirrors themselves need not be trusted. |
| |
| We are aiming to have the Google-run module mirror |
| ready to be used by default in the `go` command starting in Go 1.13. |
| Using an alternate mirror, or no mirror at all, will be trivial |
| to configure. |
| |
| ## Module Discovery |
| |
| Finally, we mentioned earlier that the module index will make it easier to |
| build sites like godoc.org. |
| Part of our work in 2019 will be a major revamp of godoc.org |
| to make it more useful for developers who need to |
| discover available modules |
| and then decide whether to rely on a given module or not. |
| |
| ## Big Picture |
| |
| This diagram shows how module source code |
| moves through the design in this post. |
| |
| .image modules2019/code.png _ 374 |
| |
| Before, all consumers of Go source code—the `go` command |
| and any sites like godoc.org—fetched code directly from each code host. |
| Now they can fetch cached code from a fast, reliable mirror, |
| while still authenticating that the downloaded bits are correct. |
| And the index service makes it easy for mirrors, godoc.org, |
| and any other similar sites to keep up with all the great new |
| code being added to the Go ecosystem every day. |
| |
| We’re excited about the future of Go modules in 2019, |
| and we hope you are too. Happy New Year! |