blob: 43a456a4576f182ef94d6e36fc342dc99ebc7734 [file] [log] [blame]
// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package analysisflags
// This file defines the -fix logic common to unitchecker and
// {single,multi}checker.
import (
"fmt"
"go/format"
"go/token"
"log"
"maps"
"os"
"sort"
"golang.org/x/tools/go/analysis"
"golang.org/x/tools/internal/analysisinternal"
"golang.org/x/tools/internal/diff"
)
// FixAction abstracts a checker action (running one analyzer on one
// package) for the purposes of applying its diagnostics' fixes.
type FixAction struct {
Name string // e.g. "analyzer@package"
FileSet *token.FileSet
ReadFileFunc analysisinternal.ReadFileFunc
Diagnostics []analysis.Diagnostic
}
// ApplyFixes attempts to apply the first suggested fix associated
// with each diagnostic reported by the specified actions.
// All fixes must have been validated by [analysisinternal.ValidateFixes].
//
// Each fix is treated as an independent change; fixes are merged in
// an arbitrary deterministic order as if by a three-way diff tool
// such as the UNIX diff3 command or 'git merge'. Any fix that cannot be
// cleanly merged is discarded, in which case the final summary tells
// the user to re-run the tool.
// TODO(adonovan): make the checker tool re-run the analysis itself.
//
// When the same file is analyzed as a member of both a primary
// package "p" and a test-augmented package "p [p.test]", there may be
// duplicate diagnostics and fixes. One set of fixes will be applied
// and the other will be discarded; but re-running the tool may then
// show zero fixes, which may cause the confused user to wonder what
// happened to the other ones.
// TODO(adonovan): consider pre-filtering completely identical fixes.
//
// A common reason for overlapping fixes is duplicate additions of the
// same import. The merge algorithm may often cleanly resolve such
// fixes, coalescing identical edits, but the merge may sometimes be
// confused by nearby changes.
//
// Even when merging succeeds, there is no guarantee that the
// composition of the two fixes is semantically correct. Coalescing
// identical edits is appropriate for imports, but not for, say,
// increments to a counter variable; the correct resolution in that
// case might be to increment it twice. Or consider two fixes that
// each delete the penultimate reference to an import or local
// variable: each fix is sound individually, and they may be textually
// distant from each other, but when both are applied, the program is
// no longer valid because it has an unreferenced import or local
// variable.
// TODO(adonovan): investigate replacing the final "gofmt" step with a
// formatter that applies the unused-import deletion logic of
// "goimports".
//
// Merging depends on both the order of fixes and they order of edits
// within them. For example, if three fixes add import "a" twice and
// import "b" once, the two imports of "a" may be combined if they
// appear in order [a, a, b], or not if they appear as [a, b, a].
// TODO(adonovan): investigate an algebraic approach to imports;
// that is, for fixes to Go source files, convert changes within the
// import(...) portion of the file into semantic edits, compose those
// edits algebraically, then convert the result back to edits.
//
// applyFixes returns success if all fixes are valid, could be cleanly
// merged, and the corresponding files were successfully updated.
//
// If the -diff flag was set, instead of updating the files it display the final
// patch composed of all the cleanly merged fixes.
//
// TODO(adonovan): handle file-system level aliases such as symbolic
// links using robustio.FileID.
func ApplyFixes(actions []FixAction, verbose bool) error {
// Select fixes to apply.
//
// If there are several for a given Diagnostic, choose the first.
// Preserve the order of iteration, for determinism.
type fixact struct {
fix *analysis.SuggestedFix
act FixAction
}
var fixes []*fixact
for _, act := range actions {
for _, diag := range act.Diagnostics {
for i := range diag.SuggestedFixes {
fix := &diag.SuggestedFixes[i]
if i == 0 {
fixes = append(fixes, &fixact{fix, act})
} else {
// TODO(adonovan): abstract the logger.
log.Printf("%s: ignoring alternative fix %q", act.Name, fix.Message)
}
}
}
}
// Read file content on demand, from the virtual
// file system that fed the analyzer (see #62292).
//
// This cache assumes that all successful reads for the same
// file name return the same content.
// (It is tempting to group fixes by package and do the
// merge/apply/format steps one package at a time, but
// packages are not disjoint, due to test variants, so this
// would not really address the issue.)
baselineContent := make(map[string][]byte)
getBaseline := func(readFile analysisinternal.ReadFileFunc, filename string) ([]byte, error) {
content, ok := baselineContent[filename]
if !ok {
var err error
content, err = readFile(filename)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
baselineContent[filename] = content
}
return content, nil
}
// Apply each fix, updating the current state
// only if the entire fix can be cleanly merged.
accumulatedEdits := make(map[string][]diff.Edit)
goodFixes := 0
fixloop:
for _, fixact := range fixes {
// Convert analysis.TextEdits to diff.Edits, grouped by file.
// Precondition: a prior call to validateFix succeeded.
fileEdits := make(map[string][]diff.Edit)
for _, edit := range fixact.fix.TextEdits {
file := fixact.act.FileSet.File(edit.Pos)
baseline, err := getBaseline(fixact.act.ReadFileFunc, file.Name())
if err != nil {
log.Printf("skipping fix to file %s: %v", file.Name(), err)
continue fixloop
}
// We choose to treat size mismatch as a serious error,
// as it indicates a concurrent write to at least one file,
// and possibly others (consider a git checkout, for example).
if file.Size() != len(baseline) {
return fmt.Errorf("concurrent file modification detected in file %s (size changed from %d -> %d bytes); aborting fix",
file.Name(), file.Size(), len(baseline))
}
fileEdits[file.Name()] = append(fileEdits[file.Name()], diff.Edit{
Start: file.Offset(edit.Pos),
End: file.Offset(edit.End),
New: string(edit.NewText),
})
}
// Apply each set of edits by merging atop
// the previous accumulated state.
after := make(map[string][]diff.Edit)
for file, edits := range fileEdits {
if prev := accumulatedEdits[file]; len(prev) > 0 {
merged, ok := diff.Merge(prev, edits)
if !ok {
// debugging
if false {
log.Printf("%s: fix %s conflicts", fixact.act.Name, fixact.fix.Message)
}
continue fixloop // conflict
}
edits = merged
}
after[file] = edits
}
// The entire fix applied cleanly; commit it.
goodFixes++
maps.Copy(accumulatedEdits, after)
// debugging
if false {
log.Printf("%s: fix %s applied", fixact.act.Name, fixact.fix.Message)
}
}
badFixes := len(fixes) - goodFixes
// Show diff or update files to final state.
var files []string
for file := range accumulatedEdits {
files = append(files, file)
}
sort.Strings(files) // for deterministic -diff
var filesUpdated, totalFiles int
for _, file := range files {
edits := accumulatedEdits[file]
if len(edits) == 0 {
continue // the diffs annihilated (a miracle?)
}
// Apply accumulated fixes.
baseline := baselineContent[file] // (cache hit)
final, err := diff.ApplyBytes(baseline, edits)
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("internal error in diff.ApplyBytes: %v", err)
}
// Attempt to format each file.
if formatted, err := format.Source(final); err == nil {
final = formatted
}
if diffFlag {
// Since we formatted the file, we need to recompute the diff.
unified := diff.Unified(file+" (old)", file+" (new)", string(baseline), string(final))
// TODO(adonovan): abstract the I/O.
os.Stdout.WriteString(unified)
} else {
// write
totalFiles++
// TODO(adonovan): abstract the I/O.
if err := os.WriteFile(file, final, 0644); err != nil {
log.Println(err)
continue
}
filesUpdated++
}
}
// TODO(adonovan): consider returning a structured result that
// maps each SuggestedFix to its status:
// - invalid
// - secondary, not selected
// - applied
// - had conflicts.
// and a mapping from each affected file to:
// - its final/original content pair, and
// - whether formatting was successful.
// Then file writes and the UI can be applied by the caller
// in whatever form they like.
// If victory was incomplete, report an error that indicates partial progress.
//
// badFixes > 0 indicates that we decided not to attempt some
// fixes due to conflicts or failure to read the source; still
// it's a relatively benign situation since the user can
// re-run the tool, and we may still make progress.
//
// filesUpdated < totalFiles indicates that some file updates
// failed. This should be rare, but is a serious error as it
// may apply half a fix, or leave the files in a bad state.
//
// These numbers are potentially misleading:
// The denominator includes duplicate conflicting fixes due to
// common files in packages "p" and "p [p.test]", which may
// have been fixed fixed and won't appear in the re-run.
// TODO(adonovan): eliminate identical fixes as an initial
// filtering step.
//
// TODO(adonovan): should we log that n files were updated in case of total victory?
if badFixes > 0 || filesUpdated < totalFiles {
if diffFlag {
return fmt.Errorf("%d of %d fixes skipped (e.g. due to conflicts)", badFixes, len(fixes))
} else {
return fmt.Errorf("applied %d of %d fixes; %d files updated. (Re-run the command to apply more.)",
goodFixes, len(fixes), filesUpdated)
}
}
if verbose {
log.Printf("applied %d fixes, updated %d files", len(fixes), filesUpdated)
}
return nil
}