| <!--{ | |
| "title": "About the go command" | |
| }--> | |
| <p>The Go distribution includes a command, named | |
| "<code><a href="/cmd/go/">go</a></code>", that | |
| automates the downloading, building, installation, and testing of Go packages | |
| and commands. This document talks about why we wrote a new command, what it | |
| is, what it's not, and how to use it.</p> | |
| <h2>Motivation</h2> | |
| <p>You might have seen early Go talks in which Rob Pike jokes that the idea | |
| for Go arose while waiting for a large Google server to compile. That | |
| really was the motivation for Go: to build a language that worked well | |
| for building the large software that Google writes and runs. It was | |
| clear from the start that such a language must provide a way to | |
| express dependencies between code libraries clearly, hence the package | |
| grouping and the explicit import blocks. It was also clear from the | |
| start that you might want arbitrary syntax for describing the code | |
| being imported; this is why import paths are string literals.</p> | |
| <p>An explicit goal for Go from the beginning was to be able to build Go | |
| code using only the information found in the source itself, not | |
| needing to write a makefile or one of the many modern replacements for | |
| makefiles. If Go needed a configuration file to explain how to build | |
| your program, then Go would have failed.</p> | |
| <p>At first, there was no Go compiler, and the initial development | |
| focused on building one and then building libraries for it. For | |
| expedience, we postponed the automation of building Go code by using | |
| make and writing makefiles. When compiling a single package involved | |
| multiple invocations of the Go compiler, we even used a program to | |
| write the makefiles for us. You can find it if you dig through the | |
| repository history.</p> | |
| <p>The purpose of the new go command is our return to this ideal, that Go | |
| programs should compile without configuration or additional effort on | |
| the part of the developer beyond writing the necessary import | |
| statements.</p> | |
| <h2>Configuration versus convention</h2> | |
| <p>The way to achieve the simplicity of a configuration-free system is to | |
| establish conventions. The system works only to the extent that those conventions | |
| are followed. When we first launched Go, many people published packages that | |
| had to be installed in certain places, under certain names, using certain build | |
| tools, in order to be used. That's understandable: that's the way it works in | |
| most other languages. Over the last few years we consistently reminded people | |
| about the <code>goinstall</code> command | |
| (now replaced by <a href="/cmd/go/#hdr-Download_and_install_packages_and_dependencies"><code>go get</code></a>) | |
| and its conventions: first, that the import path is derived in a known way from | |
| the URL of the source code; second, that the place to store the sources in | |
| the local file system is derived in a known way from the import path; third, | |
| that each directory in a source tree corresponds to a single package; and | |
| fourth, that the package is built using only information in the source code. | |
| Today, the vast majority of packages follow these conventions. | |
| The Go ecosystem is simpler and more powerful as a result.</p> | |
| <p>We received many requests to allow a makefile in a package directory to | |
| provide just a little extra configuration beyond what's in the source code. | |
| But that would have introduced new rules. Because we did not accede to such | |
| requests, we were able to write the go command and eliminate our use of make | |
| or any other build system.</p> | |
| <p>It is important to understand that the go command is not a general | |
| build tool. It cannot be configured and it does not attempt to build | |
| anything but Go packages. These are important simplifying | |
| assumptions: they simplify not only the implementation but also, more | |
| important, the use of the tool itself.</p> | |
| <h2>Go's conventions</h2> | |
| <p>The <code>go</code> command requires that code adheres to a few key, | |
| well-established conventions.</p> | |
| <p>First, the import path is derived in an known way from the URL of the | |
| source code. For Bitbucket, GitHub, Google Code, and Launchpad, the | |
| root directory of the repository is identified by the repository's | |
| main URL, without the <code>http://</code> prefix. Subdirectories are named by | |
| adding to that path. | |
| For example, the Go example programs are obtained by running</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| git clone https://github.com/golang/example | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>and thus the import path for the root directory of that repository is | |
| "<code>github.com/golang/example</code>". | |
| The <a href="https://godoc.org/github.com/golang/example/stringutil">stringutil</a> | |
| package is stored in a subdirectory, so its import path is | |
| "<code>github.com/golang/example/stringutil</code>".</p> | |
| <p>These paths are on the long side, but in exchange we get an | |
| automatically managed name space for import paths and the ability for | |
| a tool like the go command to look at an unfamiliar import path and | |
| deduce where to obtain the source code.</p> | |
| <p>Second, the place to store sources in the local file system is derived | |
| in a known way from the import path, specifically | |
| <code>$GOPATH/src/<import-path></code>. | |
| If unset, <code>$GOPATH</code> defaults to a subdirectory | |
| named <code>go</code> in the user's home directory. | |
| If <code>$GOPATH</code> is set to a list of paths, the go command tries | |
| <code><dir>/src/<import-path></code> for each of the directories in | |
| that list. | |
| </p> | |
| <p>Each of those trees contains, by convention, a top-level directory named | |
| "<code>bin</code>", for holding compiled executables, and a top-level directory | |
| named "<code>pkg</code>", for holding compiled packages that can be imported, | |
| and the "<code>src</code>" directory, for holding package source files. | |
| Imposing this structure lets us keep each of these directory trees | |
| self-contained: the compiled form and the sources are always near each | |
| other.</p> | |
| <p>These naming conventions also let us work in the reverse direction, | |
| from a directory name to its import path. This mapping is important | |
| for many of the go command's subcommands, as we'll see below.</p> | |
| <p>Third, each directory in a source tree corresponds to a single | |
| package. By restricting a directory to a single package, we don't have | |
| to create hybrid import paths that specify first the directory and | |
| then the package within that directory. Also, most file management | |
| tools and UIs work on directories as fundamental units. Tying the | |
| fundamental Go unit—the package—to file system structure means | |
| that file system tools become Go package tools. Copying, moving, or | |
| deleting a package corresponds to copying, moving, or deleting a | |
| directory.</p> | |
| <p>Fourth, each package is built using only the information present in | |
| the source files. This makes it much more likely that the tool will | |
| be able to adapt to changing build environments and conditions. For | |
| example, if we allowed extra configuration such as compiler flags or | |
| command line recipes, then that configuration would need to be updated | |
| each time the build tools changed; it would also be inherently tied | |
| to the use of a specific tool chain.</p> | |
| <h2>Getting started with the go command</h2> | |
| <p>Finally, a quick tour of how to use the go command. | |
| As mentioned above, the default <code>$GOPATH</code> on Unix is <code>$HOME/go</code>. | |
| We'll store our programs there. | |
| To use a different location, you can set <code>$GOPATH</code>; | |
| see <a href="/doc/code.html">How to Write Go Code</a> for details. | |
| <p>We first add some source code. Suppose we want to use | |
| the indexing library from the codesearch project along with a left-leaning | |
| red-black tree. We can install both with the "<code>go get</code>" | |
| subcommand:</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| $ go get github.com/google/codesearch/index | |
| $ go get github.com/petar/GoLLRB/llrb | |
| $ | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>Both of these projects are now downloaded and installed into <code>$HOME/go</code>, | |
| which contains the two directories | |
| <code>src/github.com/google/codesearch/index/</code> and | |
| <code>src/github.com/petar/GoLLRB/llrb/</code>, along with the compiled | |
| packages (in <code>pkg/</code>) for those libraries and their dependencies.</p> | |
| <p>Because we used version control systems (Mercurial and Git) to check | |
| out the sources, the source tree also contains the other files in the | |
| corresponding repositories, such as related packages. The "<code>go list</code>" | |
| subcommand lists the import paths corresponding to its arguments, and | |
| the pattern "<code>./...</code>" means start in the current directory | |
| ("<code>./</code>") and find all packages below that directory | |
| ("<code>...</code>"):</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| $ cd $HOME/go/src | |
| $ go list ./... | |
| github.com/google/codesearch/cmd/cgrep | |
| github.com/google/codesearch/cmd/cindex | |
| github.com/google/codesearch/cmd/csearch | |
| github.com/google/codesearch/index | |
| github.com/google/codesearch/regexp | |
| github.com/google/codesearch/sparse | |
| github.com/petar/GoLLRB/example | |
| github.com/petar/GoLLRB/llrb | |
| $ | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>We can also test those packages:</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| $ go test ./... | |
| ? github.com/google/codesearch/cmd/cgrep [no test files] | |
| ? github.com/google/codesearch/cmd/cindex [no test files] | |
| ? github.com/google/codesearch/cmd/csearch [no test files] | |
| ok github.com/google/codesearch/index 0.203s | |
| ok github.com/google/codesearch/regexp 0.017s | |
| ? github.com/google/codesearch/sparse [no test files] | |
| ? github.com/petar/GoLLRB/example [no test files] | |
| ok github.com/petar/GoLLRB/llrb 0.231s | |
| $ | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>If a go subcommand is invoked with no paths listed, it operates on the | |
| current directory:</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| $ cd github.com/google/codesearch/regexp | |
| $ go list | |
| github.com/google/codesearch/regexp | |
| $ go test -v | |
| === RUN TestNstateEnc | |
| --- PASS: TestNstateEnc (0.00s) | |
| === RUN TestMatch | |
| --- PASS: TestMatch (0.00s) | |
| === RUN TestGrep | |
| --- PASS: TestGrep (0.00s) | |
| PASS | |
| ok github.com/google/codesearch/regexp 0.018s | |
| $ go install | |
| $ | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>That "<code>go install</code>" subcommand installs the latest copy of the | |
| package into the pkg directory. Because the go command can analyze the | |
| dependency graph, "<code>go install</code>" also installs any packages that | |
| this package imports but that are out of date, recursively.</p> | |
| <p>Notice that "<code>go install</code>" was able to determine the name of the | |
| import path for the package in the current directory, because of the convention | |
| for directory naming. It would be a little more convenient if we could pick | |
| the name of the directory where we kept source code, and we probably wouldn't | |
| pick such a long name, but that ability would require additional configuration | |
| and complexity in the tool. Typing an extra directory name or two is a small | |
| price to pay for the increased simplicity and power.</p> | |
| <h2>Limitations</h2> | |
| <p>As mentioned above, the go command is not a general-purpose build | |
| tool. | |
| In particular, it does not have any facility for generating Go | |
| source files <em>during</em> a build, although it does provide | |
| <a href="/cmd/go/#hdr-Generate_Go_files_by_processing_source"><code>go</code> | |
| <code>generate</code></a>, | |
| which can automate the creation of Go files <em>before</em> the build. | |
| For more advanced build setups, you may need to write a | |
| makefile (or a configuration file for the build tool of your choice) | |
| to run whatever tool creates the Go files and then check those generated source files | |
| into your repository. This is more work for you, the package author, | |
| but it is significantly less work for your users, who can use | |
| "<code>go get</code>" without needing to obtain and build | |
| any additional tools.</p> | |
| <h2>More information</h2> | |
| <p>For more information, read <a href="/doc/code.html">How to Write Go Code</a> | |
| and see the <a href="/cmd/go/">go command documentation</a>.</p> |