|  | // Copyright 2019 The Go Authors. All rights reserved. | 
|  | // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style | 
|  | // license that can be found in the LICENSE file. | 
|  |  | 
|  | package ssa | 
|  |  | 
|  | // fuseIntegerComparisons optimizes inequalities such as '1 <= x && x < 5', | 
|  | // which can be optimized to 'unsigned(x-1) < 4'. | 
|  | // | 
|  | // Look for branch structure like: | 
|  | // | 
|  | //   p | 
|  | //   |\ | 
|  | //   | b | 
|  | //   |/ \ | 
|  | //   s0 s1 | 
|  | // | 
|  | // In our example, p has control '1 <= x', b has control 'x < 5', | 
|  | // and s0 and s1 are the if and else results of the comparison. | 
|  | // | 
|  | // This will be optimized into: | 
|  | // | 
|  | //   p | 
|  | //    \ | 
|  | //     b | 
|  | //    / \ | 
|  | //   s0 s1 | 
|  | // | 
|  | // where b has the combined control value 'unsigned(x-1) < 4'. | 
|  | // Later passes will then fuse p and b. | 
|  | func fuseIntegerComparisons(b *Block) bool { | 
|  | if len(b.Preds) != 1 { | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } | 
|  | p := b.Preds[0].Block() | 
|  | if b.Kind != BlockIf || p.Kind != BlockIf { | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Don't merge control values if b is likely to be bypassed anyway. | 
|  | if p.Likely == BranchLikely && p.Succs[0].Block() != b { | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } | 
|  | if p.Likely == BranchUnlikely && p.Succs[1].Block() != b { | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Check if the control values combine to make an integer inequality that | 
|  | // can be further optimized later. | 
|  | bc := b.Controls[0] | 
|  | pc := p.Controls[0] | 
|  | if !areMergeableInequalities(bc, pc) { | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // If the first (true) successors match then we have a disjunction (||). | 
|  | // If the second (false) successors match then we have a conjunction (&&). | 
|  | for i, op := range [2]Op{OpOrB, OpAndB} { | 
|  | if p.Succs[i].Block() != b.Succs[i].Block() { | 
|  | continue | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // TODO(mundaym): should we also check the cost of executing b? | 
|  | // Currently we might speculatively execute b even if b contains | 
|  | // a lot of instructions. We could just check that len(b.Values) | 
|  | // is lower than a fixed amount. Bear in mind however that the | 
|  | // other optimization passes might yet reduce the cost of b | 
|  | // significantly so we shouldn't be overly conservative. | 
|  | if !canSpeculativelyExecute(b) { | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Logically combine the control values for p and b. | 
|  | v := b.NewValue0(bc.Pos, op, bc.Type) | 
|  | v.AddArg(pc) | 
|  | v.AddArg(bc) | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Set the combined control value as the control value for b. | 
|  | b.SetControl(v) | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Modify p so that it jumps directly to b. | 
|  | p.removeEdge(i) | 
|  | p.Kind = BlockPlain | 
|  | p.Likely = BranchUnknown | 
|  | p.ResetControls() | 
|  |  | 
|  | return true | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // TODO: could negate condition(s) to merge controls. | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // getConstIntArgIndex returns the index of the first argument that is a | 
|  | // constant integer or -1 if no such argument exists. | 
|  | func getConstIntArgIndex(v *Value) int { | 
|  | for i, a := range v.Args { | 
|  | switch a.Op { | 
|  | case OpConst8, OpConst16, OpConst32, OpConst64: | 
|  | return i | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  | return -1 | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // isSignedInequality reports whether op represents the inequality < or ≤ | 
|  | // in the signed domain. | 
|  | func isSignedInequality(v *Value) bool { | 
|  | switch v.Op { | 
|  | case OpLess64, OpLess32, OpLess16, OpLess8, | 
|  | OpLeq64, OpLeq32, OpLeq16, OpLeq8: | 
|  | return true | 
|  | } | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // isUnsignedInequality reports whether op represents the inequality < or ≤ | 
|  | // in the unsigned domain. | 
|  | func isUnsignedInequality(v *Value) bool { | 
|  | switch v.Op { | 
|  | case OpLess64U, OpLess32U, OpLess16U, OpLess8U, | 
|  | OpLeq64U, OpLeq32U, OpLeq16U, OpLeq8U: | 
|  | return true | 
|  | } | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | func areMergeableInequalities(x, y *Value) bool { | 
|  | // We need both inequalities to be either in the signed or unsigned domain. | 
|  | // TODO(mundaym): it would also be good to merge when we have an Eq op that | 
|  | // could be transformed into a Less/Leq. For example in the unsigned | 
|  | // domain 'x == 0 || 3 < x' is equivalent to 'x <= 0 || 3 < x' | 
|  | inequalityChecks := [...]func(*Value) bool{ | 
|  | isSignedInequality, | 
|  | isUnsignedInequality, | 
|  | } | 
|  | for _, f := range inequalityChecks { | 
|  | if !f(x) || !f(y) { | 
|  | continue | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Check that both inequalities are comparisons with constants. | 
|  | xi := getConstIntArgIndex(x) | 
|  | if xi < 0 { | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } | 
|  | yi := getConstIntArgIndex(y) | 
|  | if yi < 0 { | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Check that the non-constant arguments to the inequalities | 
|  | // are the same. | 
|  | return x.Args[xi^1] == y.Args[yi^1] | 
|  | } | 
|  | return false | 
|  | } |