| <!--{ |
| "Title": "Go 1 and the Future of Go Programs", |
| "Path": "/doc/go1compat" |
| }--> |
| |
| <h2 id="introduction">Introduction</h2> |
| <p> |
| The release of Go version 1, Go 1 for short, is a major milestone |
| in the development of the language. Go 1 is a stable platform for |
| the growth of programs and projects written in Go. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| Go 1 defines two things: first, the specification of the language; |
| and second, the specification of a set of core APIs, the "standard |
| packages" of the Go library. The Go 1 release includes their |
| implementation in the form of two compiler suites (gc and gccgo), |
| and the core libraries themselves. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| It is intended that programs written to the Go 1 specification will |
| continue to compile and run correctly, unchanged, over the lifetime |
| of that specification. At some indefinite point, a Go 2 specification |
| may arise, but until that time, Go programs that work today should |
| continue to work even as future "point" releases of Go 1 arise (Go |
| 1.1, Go 1.2, etc.). |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| Compatibility is at the source level. Binary compatibility for |
| compiled packages is not guaranteed between releases. After a point |
| release, Go source will need to be recompiled to link against the |
| new release. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| The APIs may grow, acquiring new packages and features, but not in |
| a way that breaks existing Go 1 code. |
| </p> |
| |
| <h2 id="expectations">Expectations</h2> |
| |
| <p> |
| Although we expect that the vast majority of programs will maintain |
| this compatibility over time, it is impossible to guarantee that |
| no future change will break any program. This document is an attempt |
| to set expectations for the compatibility of Go 1 software in the |
| future. There are a number of ways in which a program that compiles |
| and runs today may fail to do so after a future point release. They |
| are all unlikely but worth recording. |
| </p> |
| |
| <ul> |
| <li> |
| Security. A security issue in the specification or implementation |
| may come to light whose resolution requires breaking compatibility. |
| We reserve the right to address such security issues. |
| </li> |
| |
| <li> |
| Unspecified behavior. The Go specification tries to be explicit |
| about most properties of the language, but there are some aspects |
| that are undefined. Programs that depend on such unspecified behavior |
| may break in future releases. |
| </li> |
| |
| <li> |
| Specification errors. If it becomes necessary to address an |
| inconsistency or incompleteness in the specification, resolving the |
| issue could affect the meaning or legality of existing programs. |
| We reserve the right to address such issues, including updating the |
| implementations. Except for security issues, no incompatible changes |
| to the specification would be made. |
| </li> |
| |
| <li> |
| Bugs. If a compiler or library has a bug that violates the |
| specification, a program that depends on the buggy behavior may |
| break if the bug is fixed. We reserve the right to fix such bugs. |
| </li> |
| |
| <li> |
| Struct literals. For the addition of features in later point |
| releases, it may be necessary to add fields to exported structs in |
| the API. Code that uses unkeyed struct literals (such as pkg.T{3, |
| "x"}) to create values of these types would fail to compile after |
| such a change. However, code that uses keyed literals (pkg.T{A: |
| 3, B: "x"}) will continue to compile after such a change. We will |
| update such data structures in a way that allows keyed struct |
| literals to remain compatible, although unkeyed literals may fail |
| to compile. (There are also more intricate cases involving nested |
| data structures or interfaces, but they have the same resolution.) |
| We therefore recommend that composite literals whose type is defined |
| in a separate package should use the keyed notation. |
| </li> |
| |
| <li> |
| Methods. As with struct fields, it may be necessary to add methods |
| to types. |
| Under some circumstances, such as when the type is embedded in |
| a struct along with another type, |
| the addition of the new method may break |
| the struct by creating a conflict with an existing method of the other |
| embedded type. |
| We cannot protect against this rare case and do not guarantee compatibility |
| should it arise. |
| </li> |
| |
| <li> |
| Dot imports. If a program imports a standard package |
| using <code>import . "path"</code>, additional names defined in the |
| imported package in future releases may conflict with other names |
| defined in the program. We do not recommend the use of <code>import .</code> |
| outside of tests, and using it may cause a program to fail |
| to compile in future releases. |
| </li> |
| |
| <li> |
| Use of package <code>unsafe</code>. Packages that import |
| <a href="/pkg/unsafe/"><code>unsafe</code></a> |
| may depend on internal properties of the Go implementation. |
| We reserve the right to make changes to the implementation |
| that may break such programs. |
| </li> |
| |
| </ul> |
| |
| <p> |
| Of course, for all of these possibilities, should they arise, we |
| would endeavor whenever feasible to update the specification, |
| compilers, or libraries without affecting existing code. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| These same considerations apply to successive point releases. For |
| instance, code that runs under Go 1.2 should be compatible with Go |
| 1.2.1, Go 1.3, Go 1.4, etc., although not necessarily with Go 1.1 |
| since it may use features added only in Go 1.2 |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| Features added between releases, available in the source repository |
| but not part of the numbered binary releases, are under active |
| development. No promise of compatibility is made for software using |
| such features until they have been released. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| Finally, although it is not a correctness issue, it is possible |
| that the performance of a program may be affected by |
| changes in the implementation of the compilers or libraries upon |
| which it depends. |
| No guarantee can be made about the performance of a |
| given program between releases. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| Although these expectations apply to Go 1 itself, we hope similar |
| considerations would be made for the development of externally |
| developed software based on Go 1. |
| </p> |
| |
| <h2 id="subrepos">Sub-repositories</h2> |
| |
| <p> |
| Code in sub-repositories of the main go tree, such as |
| <a href="//golang.org/x/net">golang.org/x/net</a>, |
| may be developed under |
| looser compatibility requirements. However, the sub-repositories |
| will be tagged as appropriate to identify versions that are compatible |
| with the Go 1 point releases. |
| </p> |
| |
| <h2 id="operating_systems">Operating systems</h2> |
| |
| <p> |
| It is impossible to guarantee long-term compatibility with operating |
| system interfaces, which are changed by outside parties. |
| The <a href="/pkg/syscall/"><code>syscall</code></a> package |
| is therefore outside the purview of the guarantees made here. |
| As of Go version 1.4, the <code>syscall</code> package is frozen. |
| Any evolution of the system call interface must be supported elsewhere, |
| such as in the |
| <a href="//golang.org/x/sys">go.sys</a> subrepository. |
| For details and background, see |
| <a href="//golang.org/s/go1.4-syscall">this document</a>. |
| </p> |
| |
| <h2 id="tools">Tools</h2> |
| |
| <p> |
| Finally, the Go toolchain (compilers, linkers, build tools, and so |
| on) is under active development and may change behavior. This |
| means, for instance, that scripts that depend on the location and |
| properties of the tools may be broken by a point release. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| These caveats aside, we believe that Go 1 will be a firm foundation |
| for the development of Go and its ecosystem. |
| </p> |