src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/prove.go

// Copyright 2016 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

package ssa

import (
	"fmt"
	"math"
)

type branch int

const (
	unknown branch = iota
	positive
	negative
)

// relation represents the set of possible relations between
// pairs of variables (v, w). Without a priori knowledge the
// mask is lt | eq | gt meaning v can be less than, equal to or
// greater than w. When the execution path branches on the condition
// `v op w` the set of relations is updated to exclude any
// relation not possible due to `v op w` being true (or false).
//
// E.g.
//
// r := relation(...)
//
// if v < w {
//   newR := r & lt
// }
// if v >= w {
//   newR := r & (eq|gt)
// }
// if v != w {
//   newR := r & (lt|gt)
// }
type relation uint

const (
	lt relation = 1 << iota
	eq
	gt
)

var relationStrings = [...]string{
	0: "none", lt: "<", eq: "==", lt | eq: "<=",
	gt: ">", gt | lt: "!=", gt | eq: ">=", gt | eq | lt: "any",
}

func (r relation) String() string {
	if r < relation(len(relationStrings)) {
		return relationStrings[r]
	}
	return fmt.Sprintf("relation(%d)", uint(r))
}

// domain represents the domain of a variable pair in which a set
// of relations is known.  For example, relations learned for unsigned
// pairs cannot be transferred to signed pairs because the same bit
// representation can mean something else.
type domain uint

const (
	signed domain = 1 << iota
	unsigned
	pointer
	boolean
)

var domainStrings = [...]string{
	"signed", "unsigned", "pointer", "boolean",
}

func (d domain) String() string {
	s := ""
	for i, ds := range domainStrings {
		if d&(1<<uint(i)) != 0 {
			if len(s) != 0 {
				s += "|"
			}
			s += ds
			d &^= 1 << uint(i)
		}
	}
	if d != 0 {
		if len(s) != 0 {
			s += "|"
		}
		s += fmt.Sprintf("0x%x", uint(d))
	}
	return s
}

type pair struct {
	v, w *Value // a pair of values, ordered by ID.
	// v can be nil, to mean the zero value.
	// for booleans the zero value (v == nil) is false.
	d domain
}

// fact is a pair plus a relation for that pair.
type fact struct {
	p pair
	r relation
}

// a limit records known upper and lower bounds for a value.
type limit struct {
	min, max   int64  // min <= value <= max, signed
	umin, umax uint64 // umin <= value <= umax, unsigned
}

func (l limit) String() string {
	return fmt.Sprintf("sm,SM,um,UM=%d,%d,%d,%d", l.min, l.max, l.umin, l.umax)
}

func (l limit) intersect(l2 limit) limit {
	if l.min < l2.min {
		l.min = l2.min
	}
	if l.umin < l2.umin {
		l.umin = l2.umin
	}
	if l.max > l2.max {
		l.max = l2.max
	}
	if l.umax > l2.umax {
		l.umax = l2.umax
	}
	return l
}

var noLimit = limit{math.MinInt64, math.MaxInt64, 0, math.MaxUint64}

// a limitFact is a limit known for a particular value.
type limitFact struct {
	vid   ID
	limit limit
}

// factsTable keeps track of relations between pairs of values.
//
// The fact table logic is sound, but incomplete. Outside of a few
// special cases, it performs no deduction or arithmetic. While there
// are known decision procedures for this, the ad hoc approach taken
// by the facts table is effective for real code while remaining very
// efficient.
type factsTable struct {
	// unsat is true if facts contains a contradiction.
	//
	// Note that the factsTable logic is incomplete, so if unsat
	// is false, the assertions in factsTable could be satisfiable
	// *or* unsatisfiable.
	unsat      bool // true if facts contains a contradiction
	unsatDepth int  // number of unsat checkpoints

	facts map[pair]relation // current known set of relation
	stack []fact            // previous sets of relations

	// known lower and upper bounds on individual values.
	limits     map[ID]limit
	limitStack []limitFact // previous entries

	// For each slice s, a map from s to a len(s)/cap(s) value (if any)
	// TODO: check if there are cases that matter where we have
	// more than one len(s) for a slice. We could keep a list if necessary.
	lens map[ID]*Value
	caps map[ID]*Value
}

// checkpointFact is an invalid value used for checkpointing
// and restoring factsTable.
var checkpointFact = fact{}
var checkpointBound = limitFact{}

func newFactsTable() *factsTable {
	ft := &factsTable{}
	ft.facts = make(map[pair]relation)
	ft.stack = make([]fact, 4)
	ft.limits = make(map[ID]limit)
	ft.limitStack = make([]limitFact, 4)
	return ft
}

// update updates the set of relations between v and w in domain d
// restricting it to r.
func (ft *factsTable) update(parent *Block, v, w *Value, d domain, r relation) {
	if lessByID(w, v) {
		v, w = w, v
		r = reverseBits[r]
	}

	p := pair{v, w, d}
	oldR, ok := ft.facts[p]
	if !ok {
		if v == w {
			oldR = eq
		} else {
			oldR = lt | eq | gt
		}
	}
	ft.stack = append(ft.stack, fact{p, oldR})
	ft.facts[p] = oldR & r
	if oldR&r == 0 {
		ft.unsat = true
	}

	// Extract bounds when comparing against constants
	if v.isGenericIntConst() {
		v, w = w, v
		r = reverseBits[r]
	}
	if v != nil && w.isGenericIntConst() {
		c := w.AuxInt
		// Note: all the +1/-1 below could overflow/underflow. Either will
		// still generate correct results, it will just lead to imprecision.
		// In fact if there is overflow/underflow, the corresponding
		// code is unreachable because the known range is outside the range
		// of the value's type.
		old, ok := ft.limits[v.ID]
		if !ok {
			old = noLimit
		}
		lim := noLimit
		switch d {
		case signed:
			switch r {
			case lt:
				lim.max = c - 1
			case lt | eq:
				lim.max = c
			case gt | eq:
				lim.min = c
			case gt:
				lim.min = c + 1
			case lt | gt:
				lim = old
				if c == lim.min {
					lim.min++
				}
				if c == lim.max {
					lim.max--
				}
			case eq:
				lim.min = c
				lim.max = c
			}
			if lim.min >= 0 {
				// int(x) >= 0 && int(x) >= N  ⇒  uint(x) >= N
				lim.umin = uint64(lim.min)
			}
			if lim.max != noLimit.max && old.min >= 0 && lim.max >= 0 {
				// 0 <= int(x) <= N  ⇒  0 <= uint(x) <= N
				// This is for a max update, so the lower bound
				// comes from what we already know (old).
				lim.umax = uint64(lim.max)
			}
		case unsigned:
			var uc uint64
			switch w.Op {
			case OpConst64:
				uc = uint64(c)
			case OpConst32:
				uc = uint64(uint32(c))
			case OpConst16:
				uc = uint64(uint16(c))
			case OpConst8:
				uc = uint64(uint8(c))
			}
			switch r {
			case lt:
				lim.umax = uc - 1
			case lt | eq:
				lim.umax = uc
			case gt | eq:
				lim.umin = uc
			case gt:
				lim.umin = uc + 1
			case lt | gt:
				lim = old
				if uc == lim.umin {
					lim.umin++
				}
				if uc == lim.umax {
					lim.umax--
				}
			case eq:
				lim.umin = uc
				lim.umax = uc
			}
			// We could use the contrapositives of the
			// signed implications to derive signed facts,
			// but it turns out not to matter.
		}
		ft.limitStack = append(ft.limitStack, limitFact{v.ID, old})
		lim = old.intersect(lim)
		ft.limits[v.ID] = lim
		if lim.min > lim.max || lim.umin > lim.umax {
			ft.unsat = true
		}
		if v.Block.Func.pass.debug > 2 {
			v.Block.Func.Warnl(parent.Pos, "parent=%s, new limits %s %s %s", parent, v, w, lim.String())
		}
	}

	// Process fence-post implications.
	//
	// First, make the condition > or >=.
	if r == lt || r == lt|eq {
		v, w = w, v
		r = reverseBits[r]
	}
	switch r {
	case gt:
		if x, delta := isConstDelta(v); x != nil && delta == 1 {
			// x+1 > w  ⇒  x >= w
			//
			// This is useful for eliminating the
			// growslice branch of append.
			ft.update(parent, x, w, d, gt|eq)
		} else if x, delta := isConstDelta(w); x != nil && delta == -1 {
			// v > x-1  ⇒  v >= x
			ft.update(parent, v, x, d, gt|eq)
		}
	case gt | eq:
		if x, delta := isConstDelta(v); x != nil && delta == -1 {
			// x-1 >= w && x > min  ⇒  x > w
			//
			// Useful for i > 0; s[i-1].
			lim, ok := ft.limits[x.ID]
			if ok && lim.min > opMin[v.Op] {
				ft.update(parent, x, w, d, gt)
			}
		} else if x, delta := isConstDelta(w); x != nil && delta == 1 {
			// v >= x+1 && x < max  ⇒  v > x
			lim, ok := ft.limits[x.ID]
			if ok && lim.max < opMax[w.Op] {
				ft.update(parent, v, x, d, gt)
			}
		}
	}
}

var opMin = map[Op]int64{
	OpAdd64: math.MinInt64, OpSub64: math.MinInt64,
	OpAdd32: math.MinInt32, OpSub32: math.MinInt32,
}

var opMax = map[Op]int64{
	OpAdd64: math.MaxInt64, OpSub64: math.MaxInt64,
	OpAdd32: math.MaxInt32, OpSub32: math.MaxInt32,
}

// isNonNegative returns true if v is known to be non-negative.
func (ft *factsTable) isNonNegative(v *Value) bool {
	if isNonNegative(v) {
		return true
	}
	l, has := ft.limits[v.ID]
	return has && (l.min >= 0 || l.umax <= math.MaxInt64)
}

// checkpoint saves the current state of known relations.
// Called when descending on a branch.
func (ft *factsTable) checkpoint() {
	if ft.unsat {
		ft.unsatDepth++
	}
	ft.stack = append(ft.stack, checkpointFact)
	ft.limitStack = append(ft.limitStack, checkpointBound)
}

// restore restores known relation to the state just
// before the previous checkpoint.
// Called when backing up on a branch.
func (ft *factsTable) restore() {
	if ft.unsatDepth > 0 {
		ft.unsatDepth--
	} else {
		ft.unsat = false
	}
	for {
		old := ft.stack[len(ft.stack)-1]
		ft.stack = ft.stack[:len(ft.stack)-1]
		if old == checkpointFact {
			break
		}
		if old.r == lt|eq|gt {
			delete(ft.facts, old.p)
		} else {
			ft.facts[old.p] = old.r
		}
	}
	for {
		old := ft.limitStack[len(ft.limitStack)-1]
		ft.limitStack = ft.limitStack[:len(ft.limitStack)-1]
		if old.vid == 0 { // checkpointBound
			break
		}
		if old.limit == noLimit {
			delete(ft.limits, old.vid)
		} else {
			ft.limits[old.vid] = old.limit
		}
	}
}

func lessByID(v, w *Value) bool {
	if v == nil && w == nil {
		// Should not happen, but just in case.
		return false
	}
	if v == nil {
		return true
	}
	return w != nil && v.ID < w.ID
}

var (
	reverseBits = [...]relation{0, 4, 2, 6, 1, 5, 3, 7}

	// maps what we learn when the positive branch is taken.
	// For example:
	//      OpLess8:   {signed, lt},
	//	v1 = (OpLess8 v2 v3).
	// If v1 branch is taken than we learn that the rangeMaks
	// can be at most lt.
	domainRelationTable = map[Op]struct {
		d domain
		r relation
	}{
		OpEq8:   {signed | unsigned, eq},
		OpEq16:  {signed | unsigned, eq},
		OpEq32:  {signed | unsigned, eq},
		OpEq64:  {signed | unsigned, eq},
		OpEqPtr: {pointer, eq},

		OpNeq8:   {signed | unsigned, lt | gt},
		OpNeq16:  {signed | unsigned, lt | gt},
		OpNeq32:  {signed | unsigned, lt | gt},
		OpNeq64:  {signed | unsigned, lt | gt},
		OpNeqPtr: {pointer, lt | gt},

		OpLess8:   {signed, lt},
		OpLess8U:  {unsigned, lt},
		OpLess16:  {signed, lt},
		OpLess16U: {unsigned, lt},
		OpLess32:  {signed, lt},
		OpLess32U: {unsigned, lt},
		OpLess64:  {signed, lt},
		OpLess64U: {unsigned, lt},

		OpLeq8:   {signed, lt | eq},
		OpLeq8U:  {unsigned, lt | eq},
		OpLeq16:  {signed, lt | eq},
		OpLeq16U: {unsigned, lt | eq},
		OpLeq32:  {signed, lt | eq},
		OpLeq32U: {unsigned, lt | eq},
		OpLeq64:  {signed, lt | eq},
		OpLeq64U: {unsigned, lt | eq},

		OpGeq8:   {signed, eq | gt},
		OpGeq8U:  {unsigned, eq | gt},
		OpGeq16:  {signed, eq | gt},
		OpGeq16U: {unsigned, eq | gt},
		OpGeq32:  {signed, eq | gt},
		OpGeq32U: {unsigned, eq | gt},
		OpGeq64:  {signed, eq | gt},
		OpGeq64U: {unsigned, eq | gt},

		OpGreater8:   {signed, gt},
		OpGreater8U:  {unsigned, gt},
		OpGreater16:  {signed, gt},
		OpGreater16U: {unsigned, gt},
		OpGreater32:  {signed, gt},
		OpGreater32U: {unsigned, gt},
		OpGreater64:  {signed, gt},
		OpGreater64U: {unsigned, gt},

		// TODO: OpIsInBounds actually test 0 <= a < b. This means
		// that the positive branch learns signed/LT and unsigned/LT
		// but the negative branch only learns unsigned/GE.
		OpIsInBounds:      {unsigned, lt},      // 0 <= arg0 < arg1
		OpIsSliceInBounds: {unsigned, lt | eq}, // 0 <= arg0 <= arg1
	}
)

// prove removes redundant BlockIf branches that can be inferred
// from previous dominating comparisons.
//
// By far, the most common redundant pair are generated by bounds checking.
// For example for the code:
//
//    a[i] = 4
//    foo(a[i])
//
// The compiler will generate the following code:
//
//    if i >= len(a) {
//        panic("not in bounds")
//    }
//    a[i] = 4
//    if i >= len(a) {
//        panic("not in bounds")
//    }
//    foo(a[i])
//
// The second comparison i >= len(a) is clearly redundant because if the
// else branch of the first comparison is executed, we already know that i < len(a).
// The code for the second panic can be removed.
//
// prove works by finding contradictions and trimming branches whose
// conditions are unsatisfiable given the branches leading up to them.
// It tracks a "fact table" of branch conditions. For each branching
// block, it asserts the branch conditions that uniquely dominate that
// block, and then separately asserts the block's branch condition and
// its negation. If either leads to a contradiction, it can trim that
// successor.
func prove(f *Func) {
	ft := newFactsTable()

	// Find length and capacity ops.
	for _, b := range f.Blocks {
		for _, v := range b.Values {
			if v.Uses == 0 {
				// We don't care about dead values.
				// (There can be some that are CSEd but not removed yet.)
				continue
			}
			switch v.Op {
			case OpSliceLen:
				if ft.lens == nil {
					ft.lens = map[ID]*Value{}
				}
				ft.lens[v.Args[0].ID] = v
			case OpSliceCap:
				if ft.caps == nil {
					ft.caps = map[ID]*Value{}
				}
				ft.caps[v.Args[0].ID] = v
			}
		}
	}

	// current node state
	type walkState int
	const (
		descend walkState = iota
		simplify
	)
	// work maintains the DFS stack.
	type bp struct {
		block *Block    // current handled block
		state walkState // what's to do
	}
	work := make([]bp, 0, 256)
	work = append(work, bp{
		block: f.Entry,
		state: descend,
	})

	idom := f.Idom()
	sdom := f.sdom()

	// DFS on the dominator tree.
	//
	// For efficiency, we consider only the dominator tree rather
	// than the entire flow graph. On the way down, we consider
	// incoming branches and accumulate conditions that uniquely
	// dominate the current block. If we discover a contradiction,
	// we can eliminate the entire block and all of its children.
	// On the way back up, we consider outgoing branches that
	// haven't already been considered. This way we consider each
	// branch condition only once.
	for len(work) > 0 {
		node := work[len(work)-1]
		work = work[:len(work)-1]
		parent := idom[node.block.ID]
		branch := getBranch(sdom, parent, node.block)

		switch node.state {
		case descend:
			if branch != unknown {
				if !tryPushBranch(ft, parent, branch) {
					// node.block is unreachable.
					// Remove it and don't visit
					// its children.
					removeBranch(parent, branch)
					break
				}
				// Otherwise, we can now commit to
				// taking this branch. We'll restore
				// ft when we unwind.
			}

			work = append(work, bp{
				block: node.block,
				state: simplify,
			})
			for s := sdom.Child(node.block); s != nil; s = sdom.Sibling(s) {
				work = append(work, bp{
					block: s,
					state: descend,
				})
			}

		case simplify:
			simplifyBlock(sdom, ft, node.block)

			if branch != unknown {
				popBranch(ft)
			}
		}
	}
}

// getBranch returns the range restrictions added by p
// when reaching b. p is the immediate dominator of b.
func getBranch(sdom SparseTree, p *Block, b *Block) branch {
	if p == nil || p.Kind != BlockIf {
		return unknown
	}
	// If p and p.Succs[0] are dominators it means that every path
	// from entry to b passes through p and p.Succs[0]. We care that
	// no path from entry to b passes through p.Succs[1]. If p.Succs[0]
	// has one predecessor then (apart from the degenerate case),
	// there is no path from entry that can reach b through p.Succs[1].
	// TODO: how about p->yes->b->yes, i.e. a loop in yes.
	if sdom.isAncestorEq(p.Succs[0].b, b) && len(p.Succs[0].b.Preds) == 1 {
		return positive
	}
	if sdom.isAncestorEq(p.Succs[1].b, b) && len(p.Succs[1].b.Preds) == 1 {
		return negative
	}
	return unknown
}

// tryPushBranch tests whether it is possible to branch from Block b
// in direction br and, if so, pushes the branch conditions in the
// factsTable and returns true. A successful tryPushBranch must be
// paired with a popBranch.
func tryPushBranch(ft *factsTable, b *Block, br branch) bool {
	ft.checkpoint()
	c := b.Control
	updateRestrictions(b, ft, boolean, nil, c, lt|gt, br)
	if tr, has := domainRelationTable[b.Control.Op]; has {
		// When we branched from parent we learned a new set of
		// restrictions. Update the factsTable accordingly.
		updateRestrictions(b, ft, tr.d, c.Args[0], c.Args[1], tr.r, br)
	}
	if ft.unsat {
		// This branch's conditions contradict some known
		// fact, so it cannot be taken. Unwind the facts.
		//
		// (Since we never checkpoint an unsat factsTable, we
		// don't really need factsTable.unsatDepth, but
		// there's no cost to keeping checkpoint/restore more
		// general.)
		ft.restore()
		return false
	}
	return true
}

// popBranch undoes the effects of a successful tryPushBranch.
func popBranch(ft *factsTable) {
	ft.restore()
}

// updateRestrictions updates restrictions from the immediate
// dominating block (p) using r. r is adjusted according to the branch taken.
func updateRestrictions(parent *Block, ft *factsTable, t domain, v, w *Value, r relation, branch branch) {
	if t == 0 || branch == unknown {
		// Trivial case: nothing to do, or branch unknown.
		// Shoult not happen, but just in case.
		return
	}
	if branch == negative {
		// Negative branch taken, complement the relations.
		r = (lt | eq | gt) ^ r
	}
	for i := domain(1); i <= t; i <<= 1 {
		if t&i == 0 {
			continue
		}
		ft.update(parent, v, w, i, r)

		if i == boolean && v == nil && w != nil && (w.Op == OpIsInBounds || w.Op == OpIsSliceInBounds) {
			// 0 <= a0 < a1 (or 0 <= a0 <= a1)
			//
			// domainRelationTable handles the a0 / a1
			// relation, but not the 0 / a0 relation.
			//
			// On the positive branch we learn 0 <= a0,
			// but this turns out never to be useful.
			//
			// On the negative branch we learn (0 > a0 ||
			// a0 >= a1) (or (0 > a0 || a0 > a1)). We
			// can't express an || condition, but we learn
			// something if we can disprove the LHS.
			if r == eq && ft.isNonNegative(w.Args[0]) {
				// false == w, so we're on the
				// negative branch. a0 >= 0, so the
				// LHS is false. Thus, the RHS holds.
				opr := eq | gt
				if w.Op == OpIsSliceInBounds {
					opr = gt
				}
				ft.update(parent, w.Args[0], w.Args[1], signed, opr)
			}
		}

		// Additional facts we know given the relationship between len and cap.
		if i != signed && i != unsigned {
			continue
		}
		if v.Op == OpSliceLen && r&lt == 0 && ft.caps[v.Args[0].ID] != nil {
			// len(s) > w implies cap(s) > w
			// len(s) >= w implies cap(s) >= w
			// len(s) == w implies cap(s) >= w
			ft.update(parent, ft.caps[v.Args[0].ID], w, i, r|gt)
		}
		if w.Op == OpSliceLen && r&gt == 0 && ft.caps[w.Args[0].ID] != nil {
			// same, length on the RHS.
			ft.update(parent, v, ft.caps[w.Args[0].ID], i, r|lt)
		}
		if v.Op == OpSliceCap && r&gt == 0 && ft.lens[v.Args[0].ID] != nil {
			// cap(s) < w implies len(s) < w
			// cap(s) <= w implies len(s) <= w
			// cap(s) == w implies len(s) <= w
			ft.update(parent, ft.lens[v.Args[0].ID], w, i, r|lt)
		}
		if w.Op == OpSliceCap && r&lt == 0 && ft.lens[w.Args[0].ID] != nil {
			// same, capacity on the RHS.
			ft.update(parent, v, ft.lens[w.Args[0].ID], i, r|gt)
		}
	}
}

// simplifyBlock simplifies some constant values in b and evaluates
// branches to non-uniquely dominated successors of b.
func simplifyBlock(sdom SparseTree, ft *factsTable, b *Block) {
	// Replace OpSlicemask operations in b with constants where possible.
	for _, v := range b.Values {
		if v.Op != OpSlicemask {
			continue
		}
		x, delta := isConstDelta(v.Args[0])
		if x == nil {
			continue
		}
		// slicemask(x + y)
		// if x is larger than -y (y is negative), then slicemask is -1.
		lim, ok := ft.limits[x.ID]
		if !ok {
			continue
		}
		if lim.umin > uint64(-delta) {
			if v.Args[0].Op == OpAdd64 {
				v.reset(OpConst64)
			} else {
				v.reset(OpConst32)
			}
			if b.Func.pass.debug > 0 {
				b.Func.Warnl(v.Pos, "Proved slicemask not needed")
			}
			v.AuxInt = -1
		}
	}

	if b.Kind != BlockIf {
		return
	}

	// Consider outgoing edges from this block.
	parent := b
	for i, branch := range [...]branch{positive, negative} {
		child := parent.Succs[i].b
		if getBranch(sdom, parent, child) != unknown {
			// For edges to uniquely dominated blocks, we
			// already did this when we visited the child.
			continue
		}
		// For edges to other blocks, this can trim a branch
		// even if we couldn't get rid of the child itself.
		if !tryPushBranch(ft, parent, branch) {
			// This branch is impossible, so remove it
			// from the block.
			removeBranch(parent, branch)
			// No point in considering the other branch.
			// (It *is* possible for both to be
			// unsatisfiable since the fact table is
			// incomplete. We could turn this into a
			// BlockExit, but it doesn't seem worth it.)
			break
		}
		popBranch(ft)
	}
}

func removeBranch(b *Block, branch branch) {
	if b.Func.pass.debug > 0 {
		verb := "Proved"
		if branch == positive {
			verb = "Disproved"
		}
		c := b.Control
		if b.Func.pass.debug > 1 {
			b.Func.Warnl(b.Pos, "%s %s (%s)", verb, c.Op, c)
		} else {
			b.Func.Warnl(b.Pos, "%s %s", verb, c.Op)
		}
	}
	b.Kind = BlockFirst
	b.SetControl(nil)
	if branch == positive {
		b.swapSuccessors()
	}
}

// isNonNegative returns true is v is known to be greater or equal to zero.
func isNonNegative(v *Value) bool {
	switch v.Op {
	case OpConst64:
		return v.AuxInt >= 0

	case OpConst32:
		return int32(v.AuxInt) >= 0

	case OpStringLen, OpSliceLen, OpSliceCap,
		OpZeroExt8to64, OpZeroExt16to64, OpZeroExt32to64:
		return true

	case OpRsh64x64:
		return isNonNegative(v.Args[0])
	}
	return false
}

// isConstDelta returns non-nil if v is equivalent to w+delta (signed).
func isConstDelta(v *Value) (w *Value, delta int64) {
	cop := OpConst64
	switch v.Op {
	case OpAdd32, OpSub32:
		cop = OpConst32
	}
	switch v.Op {
	case OpAdd64, OpAdd32:
		if v.Args[0].Op == cop {
			return v.Args[1], v.Args[0].AuxInt
		}
		if v.Args[1].Op == cop {
			return v.Args[0], v.Args[1].AuxInt
		}
	case OpSub64, OpSub32:
		if v.Args[1].Op == cop {
			aux := v.Args[1].AuxInt
			if aux != -aux { // Overflow; too bad
				return v.Args[0], -aux
			}
		}
	}
	return nil, 0
}